Component-based Information Systems: Toward a Framework for Evaluation

Information systems evaluation is problematic. It is noted to be under-researched in relation to development, is contentious in terms of quantification, measurement and effort required and there is a marked difference between theoretical development and practical use. Drawing on a critical review of ‘tradition’ in information systems evaluation this paper applies the lessons learnt to the context of componentbased development. In common with development approaches that have preceded components, there is consequently a danger that investment decisions fall prey to ‘hype’ and there is evidence to suggest that there is considerable risk inherent in the migration to component-based systems. Such risk provides an opportunity to bridge the perceived chasm between information systems development and evaluation in three ways. Firstly, by integrating business driven evaluation with the development approach at an early stage of the adoption process. Secondly, by using this integration to lessen the perceived effort of evaluation. Thirdly, by making evaluation a dynamic and ongoing process. With this in mind, the paper discusses the demands of evaluating component-based development in the context of a conceptual framework that concentrates on gaining a pluralistic understanding of the information needs of stakeholders.